Meet In CommonNews

Local

Nye County got a $1M federal grant. The catch? No DEI and other Trump admin priorities

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Nevada Independent

Two weeks ago, Nye County approved a noncontroversial $1 million federal grant aimed at boosting public safety. But buried in the award was language requiring the county to comply with swaths of President Donald Trump's policies, including all executive orders and presidential memoranda. It's at least the second such grant awarded to a local government in Nevada with these strings attached and marks a departure from previous grants by requiring the county to follow sweeping executive orders that typically only apply to federal agencies. The grant, which passed unanimously through a consent agenda, is aimed at adding security enhancements — such as surveillance cameras — in local parks and to county buildings. Among the 44 conditions in the grant, one prohibits the county from restricting communication regarding an individual's citizenship status with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or other federal entities.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Nevada Independent

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Companies should be responsible for serious harm caused by suppliers they choose.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A bot will reject your honest résumé. Is it okay to add a year of experience?

A role requires three years of experience. You have two, possess all the practical skills, and know automated screening will reject an honest application before a person sees it.

Can an unfair gatekeeping system justify misrepresentation?

Explore this quandary