Meet In CommonNews

Local

OPINION: Don’t let the midterms fool you — Oligarchs and their money-backed media campaigns are still driving our backsliding democracy

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Student Life

After a midterm election race characterized by deep polarization between voters over Democratic and Republican candidates, a sea of blue prevailed and swept both the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate from Republican control. Make no mistake: The division between the Democratic and Republican parties has been historic, amplified and certainly not coincidental. Rather, the closeness of the midterm race was a direct result of the unchecked money and time elites invested in swinging states — investments that happened primarily under the table. We now exist in a system characterized by the decline of democracy, because of the lack of guardrails that make backsliding possible. The midterm race was close because political campaigns are almost entirely bolstered by money, with mass media corporations and elites profiting off our desire to engage with politics.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Student Life

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Essential services should offer a workable alternative to smartphone-only access.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary