Meet In CommonNews

Local

Opinion: The danger of an uncritical alliance

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Concord Monitor

Jackson Lears wrote in Harper’s Magazine that George Washington cautioned the new republic to avoid both passionate attachment and habitual hatred in engagement with other countries. Our country has strayed from this admonition in its present foreign relationships. The examples that Lears offers are a full-throated, uncritical United States alliance with Israel and an ardent conviction of a persistent threat from Russia. Considering the former, the U.S. relationship with Israel has led to the tendency “to excuse Israel’s wars of conquest as retaliation against their supposedly hostile Arab neighbors.” The U.S. was the first country to recognize the state of Israel in 1948. Since then, the U.S. has accepted that nothing Israel might do would offend the Americans to the point of reprisal. Continued U.S.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Concord Monitor

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Large platforms should make it easier for smaller competitors to connect with their services.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The restaurant forgot your expensive entrée. Do you point it out?

After a crowded dinner, you notice the restaurant omitted your most expensive entrée from the bill. Service was slow, the server seemed overwhelmed, and correcting it may create trouble for the person who made the mistake.

Does protecting someone from consequences ever justify benefiting from their error?

Explore this quandary