Meet In CommonNews

Local

Oregon’s U.S. Sen. Wyden says he’ll use most powerful Senate committee to undo Republican cuts

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Lake County Examiner

Oregon’s senior U.S. senator and Democrats holding a new majority in Congress in January will immediately try to undo work requirements and cuts to Medicaid passed by Congressional Republicans in 2025 that are set to take effect Jan. 1.When the new Congress begins in January, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, will ascend for the second time in a decade to chair of the Senate Finance Committee, the powerful committee tasked with tax, trade, revenue and healthcare policy.At a news conference Monday morning, Wyden said Democrats will also immediately move to pass legislation to reinstall now-expired Affordable Care Act tax credits for Americans who have seen their healthcare premiums skyrocket.“Over the last couple of years, Republicans have used their majorities to take food and healthcare away from vulnerable people and handed the proceeds to the very people at the top and the corporate interests,” he said.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Lake County Examiner

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Sporting success should include character and contribution, not only winning.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary