Meet In CommonNews

Local

Oregon top logging firms include Roseburg, Klamath Falls operations

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Rogue Valley Times

Award winners consistently exceed requirements to help forest health, board of forestry says The Oregon Board of Forestry recently selected three logging companies as Operator of the Year for their regions. Lone Rock Logging, based in Roseburg, was the Operator of the Year for Southwest Oregon. Wood River Timber, headquartered in Klamath Falls, was Eastern Oregon’s award winner. Iron Horse Logging out of Mapleton, was the Northwest Oregon Operator of the Year. The awards are given to forestry companies that protect natural resources and improve forest health at a level that consistently meets or exceeds requirements of the Oregon Forest Practices Act. Videos on each of the winners can be viewed online at https://www.oregon.gov/odf/Working/Pages/default.aspx. Forward-thinking and technology-driven Aaron Bunt, logging supervisor for Lone Rock Logging, said the company was one of the first in the region to use tethered cutting and also switched to grapple logging in recent years.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Rogue Valley Times

Featured places to meet in Klamath Falls, OR

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Abby's

Abby's Klamath Falls, OR, 97603 US

Abby's

Abby's Klamath Falls, OR, 97601 US

City guide for Klamath Falls, OR

Community Poll

Protecting natural places can justify limiting visitor numbers.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A private joke from years ago goes public. How long should it follow the person who wrote it?

Someone shares a screenshot of a tasteless joke made years ago in a private friends' chat. The person who wrote it says they were performing for a small audience, have changed, and never agreed to have the message made public.

How private should speech remain when it reveals something troubling?

Explore this quandary