Outcome vs. Output: Why Grant Reports Confuse Activity With Change

A food bank reports that it distributed 2 million meals last year. That sounds like success, and it may well be. But the number says nothing about whether any family that showed up at its door is now more secure, or whether the same families will be back next month. The meals are an output. The change in a family's life is an outcome, and the two are not the same thing. This distinction is the most common failure point in grant reporting. An output is what a program does: meals served, classes taught, houses built, calls answered. An outcome is what changes because of that work: a person's situation, skill, health, or stability, measured against where they started. A program can produce impressive outputs and no outcomes at all. It can also produce real outcomes with modest outputs. Funders that judge by outputs alone reward busyness, not results. The word itself is plain.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.