Meet In CommonNews

Local

Parish Council Withdraws Two Ordinances, Hears Updates

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Bogalusa Daily News

Council withdraws proposed ordinances, finances and ongoing improvement projects the daily news The Washington Parish Council voted to withdraw two proposed ordinances during its regular meeting Monday, Nov. 9, allowing additional review before either measure is brought back for consideration. Council members also received updates on the parish’s overcrowded jail, financial standing, road maintenance and several ongoing improvement projects. The meeting, held at the Washington Parish Courthouse, began with public hearings on proposed changes to planning and building permit fees and a proposed occupational license tax on businesses operating within the parish. The first measure, Ordinance No. 26-795, proposed revisions to the parish’s planning and building permit fee schedule, including state-mandated permit administrative fees. However, the council’s attorney explained that the ordinance should first be reviewed by the Planning Commission before advancing to the full council.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Bogalusa Daily News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

People affected by infrastructure routes should have a meaningful role in choosing them.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You love the free sample but will never buy it. How many times may you circle back?

A warehouse store is offering delicious samples. You have no intention of purchasing the product, but the employee seems bored and has trays to spare. After taking two, you consider removing your jacket and returning for a third.

Is exploiting generosity wrong when the giver appears not to care?

Explore this quandary