Meet In CommonNews

Local

Permitting overhaul advances in US Senate with tepid bipartisan support

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: New Hampshire Bulletin

A proposal to overhaul the federal process for permits to construct energy projects passed a procedural hurdle in the U.S. Senate on Monday, though several Democratic supporters said the legislation needed more work. The Senate voted, 73-25, to advance what’s known as the permitting reform bill, despite opposition from some corners of the environmental advocacy world who are influential with Democrats. Several Democratic members said they would be pursuing major changes through the amendment process. The measure is sponsored by the bipartisan leaders of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee — led by West Virginia Republican Shelley Moore Capito as chair, with Rhode Island’s Sheldon Whitehouse the top Democrat — and the Senate Energy Committee’s Chair Mike Lee of Utah and ranking Democrat Martin Heinrich of New Mexico.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at New Hampshire Bulletin

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Equipment rules should preserve fair competition even when they limit innovation.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Would you want a doctor to give you a fake pill if the lie might make you feel better?

A patient has persistent symptoms that have not responded to standard treatments. A harmless placebo may help, but its effect could weaken if the clinician fully explains that it contains no active medicine.

Can a beneficial deception respect the person it helps?

Explore this quandary