Meet In CommonNews

Local

Planners urge rejection of heavy industrial zoning for East Kent Street storage yard

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Wausau Pilot and Review

By Shereen Siewert | Wausau Pilot & Review Wausau planners are urging city leaders to reject heavy industrial zoning for a 5.45-acre storage yard on East Kent Street, calling the request spot zoning near homes and soccer fields. “This would be a case of spot zoning, whereby a parcel’s zoning differs significantly from the surrounding area to favor the owner of a particular property and is not consistent with long-range community planning,” Assistant City Planner Carrie Edmondson wrote in a report to the Wausau Plan Commission, which takes up the request Nov. 17. David Sether of Revi Design, a Wausau landscaping company, is asking to rezone 317 E. Kent St., just east of Grand Avenue, from Urban Mixed-Use to Heavy Industrial. According to the application, Sether wants to expand the equipment and material yard on the site and build a storage building with an attached office. The stakes reach beyond one business.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Wausau Pilot and Review

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Researchers should publish important limitations alongside the main findings.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The restaurant forgot your expensive entrée. Do you point it out?

After a crowded dinner, you notice the restaurant omitted your most expensive entrée from the bill. Service was slow, the server seemed overwhelmed, and correcting it may create trouble for the person who made the mistake.

Does protecting someone from consequences ever justify benefiting from their error?

Explore this quandary