Meet In CommonNews

Local

Police Blotter: Infliction of corporal injury on spouse, rape by force or fear, assault to commit rape

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Stanford Daily

This report covers incidents from Nov. 3 to Nov. 8 as recorded in the Stanford University Department of Public Safety (SUDPS) bulletin. Learn more about the Clery Act and how The Daily approaches reporting on crime and safety here. Tuesday, Nov. 3 Theft by use of access card information through credit card/ATM between 9:53 p.m. on Nov. 2 and 9:00 a.m. on Nov. 3 was reported at 700 Cedro Way. Grand theft of a bicycle between 5:00 p.m. on Oct. 30 and 10:00 a.m. on Nov. 2 was reported at 200 Rosse Lane. A student safety incident between Jan. 1 and Oct. 11 was reported at 400 Jane Stanford Way. Assault to commit rape between Jan. 1 and Oct. 11 was reported at 400 Jane Stanford Way. Grand theft of money, labor and property from a building on 11:05 p.m. on Nov. 2 was reported at 37 Angell Court. Possession of a non-firearm weapon on 11:05 p.m. on Nov. 2 was reported at Angell Court. Disorderly conduct of loitering on private property on 11:05 p.m. on Nov. 2 was reported at Angell Court.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Stanford Daily

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Countries should consider serious effects on people abroad when setting domestic policies.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The restaurant forgot your expensive entrée. Do you point it out?

After a crowded dinner, you notice the restaurant omitted your most expensive entrée from the bill. Service was slow, the server seemed overwhelmed, and correcting it may create trouble for the person who made the mistake.

Does protecting someone from consequences ever justify benefiting from their error?

Explore this quandary