Meet In CommonNews

Local

Polish authorities backtrack on claim Krakow shooter was 'far-right'

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Human Events

Polish Interior Minister, police Screenshot/X, AI enhancedReading modeReadingAaPaperAaSepiaAaNightAfter a deadly mass shooting in Krakow on Saturday, Polish government officials alleged that the killer was "far-right." As they shared this narrative, they "ordered the immediate deletion of the Facebook account of the killer," said Spanish VOX party member Hermann Tertsch. Now, Polish prosecutors have said that there is no evidence that shooter Michal Oksinski was far-right at all. The suspect was shot by police then arrested, but later died from his injuries.As the government backtracked from the assertion that the man was far-right, government spokesman Adam Szlapka told news that "Until the matter is fully clarified and the authorities are in possession of complete information, it is best to refrain from making comments, even if there are some initial indications."In a press conference, prosecutors said they did not know why Oksinski opened fire.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Human Events

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Predictable working hours are more important than maximum scheduling flexibility.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary