Meet In CommonNews

Local

Port: Local lawmakers should limit legislation ahead of 2027 session

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Grand Forks Herald

MINOT — North Dakota's lawmakers have no shortage of ideas. Whether they have enough good ones is another question. With Legislative Management having concluded its interim meetings this week, lawmakers should consider whether their workload has gotten out of hand. According to Legislative Council, lawmakers introduced 1,020 bills and 69 resolutions during the 2025 session, the most since 2009. In 2017, they introduced 779 bills, a nearly 31% increase in eight years. Remember, this workload is handled by part-time lawmakers who have no offices, and no staff, during sessions held every other year with a constitutional limit of 80 days per biennium. That's a lot of legislating in a very short period. Particularly when we consider that lawmakers must also spend their time scrutinizing agency budgets, listening to constituents and overseeing the machinery of state government. Are these extra bills worth it? Consider some of the nonsense lawmakers debated last session.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Grand Forks Herald

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Public contracts should consider quality and reliability, even when the lowest bid costs less.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You lecture everyone about climate change—then get invited on a dream flight. Do you go?

A close friend living overseas invites you to an important celebration. Flying is affordable but carbon-intensive. Your individual decision will not determine whether the flight operates, yet it conflicts with commitments you publicly encourage others to make.

When is a small personal contribution to a large harm morally significant?

Explore this quandary