Meet In CommonNews

Local

Port: Shouting match erupts during legislative meeting over Development Fund controversy

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Grand Forks Herald

MINOT — An audit of the North Dakota Development Fund delivered to that committee in September revealed some disturbing information about serious conflicts of interest and a problematic lack of documentation around millions of taxpayer dollars. Those findings have made headlines around the state. It's a controversy that seems likely to end the existence of the fund. Gov. Kelly Armstrong promised to "tear" the Commerce Department "down to the studs" upon taking office. Now his administration has paused some operations of the Development Fund, and appears poised to ask lawmakers to shut it down in the upcoming legislative session. Amid all that, unfortunately, has been Sen. Jeff Magrum, the chair of the Legislative Audit and Fiscal Review Committee. His antics in elected office often veer between the cartoonish (his claim that colonoscopies cause colon cancer) and the borderline sinister (his push for clemency for unrepentant far-right extremists).

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Grand Forks Herald

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Institutions should demonstrate equal treatment through people's actual experiences, not just written policies.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A pricey AI tutor can turn B students into A students. Should schools let them use it?

An effective AI tutor adapts to each student and dramatically improves performance, but its subscription is expensive. A public school cannot provide it to everyone and worries that allowing its use will deepen existing inequality.

Should access be limited when a beneficial tool cannot yet be shared fairly?

Explore this quandary