Meet In CommonNews

Local

Port Washington North Village Board sets Christmas deadline for New Oasis tree survey and landscape plan

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Roslyn News

If the private developer New Oasis Development LLC hopes to move forward with its proposed project of building a senior living complex in Port Washington North, it needs to submit a tree survey and a landscape plan before Christmas. Port Washington North Mayor Robert Weitzner set the deadline at the village board of trustees meeting on Thursday, Nov. 12. The hearing on New Oasis’s proposed project was postponed until Jan. 6, following concerns from both board members and residents. In a bid awarded over a decade ago, New Oasis proposed construction of a new senior living facility with 44 townhomes and a clubhouse. Neighboring residents concerned over the potential environmental impact and increased traffic resulting from the project have filed a lawsuit against the company. Timely submission of requested documentation has been an issue for the applicant in a case that has dragged on for years.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Roslyn News

Featured places to meet in Port Washington North, NY

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

No featured venues are available for this city yet. You can choose a meeting place when creating a Roundtable.

City guide for Port Washington North, NY

Community Poll

Emergency powers should expire automatically unless publicly renewed.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary