Meet In CommonNews

Local

Purple is the New Party: We will see

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: VC Reporter

There is an old Eastern parable about a wise guru and a little boy. In the story a boy has a birthday party and he gets a horse, and everyone in the village says how special he is, and the guru says, “We will see.” While riding the horse, the boy falls and breaks his leg, and the villagers say how sad it is, and the guru says, “We will see.” Then war breaks out and all the boys are called to battle, except the boy with the broken leg, and everyone in the village says how lucky the boy is, but the guru says, “We will see.” And so on and so on. I tell you that story to preface my thoughts on the 2026 midterm election. While the Democratic Party winning the Senate and the House in historic ways feels like a great step forward for those against the MAGA movement, I must retort with, we will see. For years I was a conservative on the libertarian wing. This month will be my 18th year writing for the Ventura County Reporter, and my politics have swayed more to the left now.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at VC Reporter

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

New competition formats should improve the experience for players as well as audiences.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your best friend is an AI that profits when you stay lonely. Is the friendship real?

A lonely adult considers an AI companion their closest confidant. The service is always patient and supportive, but the company profits when users spend more time engaged with it.

Does a comforting system have a duty to make itself less necessary?

Explore this quandary