Meet In CommonNews

Local

[Review] Zach Cregger’s Resident Evil Becomes the Highest Rated Movie in the Franchises History

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Eagle Eye News

On Sept. 18, the new Resident Evil film was released into the theaters. It is a horror film written by Zach Cregger and directed by Cregger and Shay Hatten. Just like the Resident Evil games, horror, comedy and survival are at the forefront of the new Resident Evil movie. The film stars Austin Abrams, who plays the main character Bryan Hodukavich, and Zach Cherry, playing the supporting role of Carl, a scientist at Umbrella, which is a laboratory on the top floor of the Racoon City Hospital. Kali Reis, Paul Walter Hauser and Will Merrick also play supporting roles as Maxine, Paul and Dave, respectively, who are all employees of Umbrella. In the original Resident Evil II Remake, Leon Kennedy and Claire Redfield traverse through the events of Racoon City on Sept. 30, 1998, trying to escape the outbreak of zombies. The main antagonists in the game are Mr. X and William Birkin, a scientist at Umbrella.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Eagle Eye News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Private companies delivering public services should face the same transparency duties as public agencies.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your best friend is an AI that profits when you stay lonely. Is the friendship real?

A lonely adult considers an AI companion their closest confidant. The service is always patient and supportive, but the company profits when users spend more time engaged with it.

Does a comforting system have a duty to make itself less necessary?

Explore this quandary