Meet In CommonNews

Local

Romney has a 2028 prediction — but there’s a catch

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Deseret News

Former Sen. Mitt Romney said he stands by his prediction that Vice President JD Vance will still be the Republican Party’s next presidential nominee, but also noted that it depends on how President Donald Trump handles his last two years in office. In a statement to the Deseret News, Romney said Republican losses in the recent midterm elections don’t change his past prediction that Vance will be the next GOP leader. “I still think the vice president is the most likely of potential contenders to become the nominee, though that’s less certain following the election,” he said. “But as the midterms show, predictions like this can change pretty dramatically with events.” During Romney’s congressional exit interview, he predicted in late 2024 — after Trump and Vance won — that Vance would likely be the party’s 2028 nominee for the next era of politics post-Trump. “MAGA is the Republican Party, and Donald Trump is the Republican Party today,” he told CNN’s Jake Tapper at the time.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Deseret News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Classroom technology should prove educational value before becoming standard.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You wear an expensive outfit once and return it spotless. Clever or dishonest?

You buy an expensive outfit for a single event, keep it spotless, and return it the next day. The store's generous policy allows returns without asking whether an item was worn.

Does exploiting a policy differ from breaking a rule?

Explore this quandary