Meet In CommonNews

Local

Santa Barbara Council Approves Ordinance with New Rules for Massage Providers

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Noozhawk

A new Santa Barbara ordinance will force massage establishments and therapists to pay more fees and comply with new requirements. The ordinance passed the City Council in a 5-1 vote on Tuesday, with Councilman Oscar Gutierrez voting against it and Councilman Mike Jordan recusing himself because his household includes a masseuse. Gutierrez said he feared it could be “weaponized” against businesses. “I just know that in the past there have been certain businesses when they got accused or faced with certain repercussions, they took it out on their competition,” Gutierrez said. “So I’m worried this will encourage that.” Santa Barbara Police Chief Kelly Gordon said they tried to craft the ordinance in a way that gives them the enforcement tools to deal with bad actors and protect law-abiding establishments.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Noozhawk

Featured places to meet in Santa Barbara, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

101 Deli

101 Deli 130 North Calle Cesar Chavez Santa Barbara, CA, 93103 US

805 Boba

805 Boba 651 Paseo Nuevo Santa Barbara, CA, 93101 US

Aegean

Aegean 731 De la Guerra Place Santa Barbara, CA, 93101 US

City guide for Santa Barbara, CA

Community Poll

Independent replication should normally precede major decisions based on a single study.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your family connection could get your child into their dream school. Do you use it?

A university argues that considering family ties builds loyalty and encourages donations that fund scholarships. Critics say the preference preserves inherited advantage and takes places from stronger applicants.

Can benefits to the whole institution justify an unequal admissions advantage?

Explore this quandary