Meet In CommonNews

Local

Santa Barbara Football Has Too Many Weapons for Baldwin Park to Handle, Rolls to 42-15 Win

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Noozhawk

Everything seemed to be clicking for the Santa Barbara High football team on the road Friday, as the Golden Tornado roared past Baldwin Park, 42-15, in a CIF-SS Division 6 quarterfinal game. Quarterback Griffin Arnold threw five touchdown passes and running back Everett Rabb-Preston rushed for 148 yards and a touchdown on 19 carries to lead a high-octane attack. The defense held Baldwin Park without a touchdown until 1:54 left in the third quarter. Last week, Baldwin Park scored 35 points to beat Ventura in the first round and came into the quarterfinal game averaging over 40 points a game. Santa Barbara (9-3) will return to Peabody Stadium for a semifinal game against Beaumont next Friday. Beaumont defeated Summit, 42-22. Baldwin Park (10-2) opened the scoring with a field goal at the 7:23 mark of the first quarter. Santa Barbara answered with a Rabb-Preston touchdown run at 10:40 of the second quarter and never looked back.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Noozhawk

Featured places to meet in Baldwin Park, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

City guide for Baldwin Park, CA

Community Poll

Creators should be compensated when their work is used commercially to train AI systems.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You are vegetarian, but the leftover steak is headed for the trash. Do you eat it?

A vegetarian avoids buying meat because of animal welfare concerns. At work events, untouched meat is routinely thrown away, and eating it would neither increase demand nor cause another animal to be harmed.

Should a moral practice be judged by its consequences or its consistency?

Explore this quandary