Meet In CommonNews

Local

SCHHA (Pronounced “Shaw”) – Who Are We?

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Ka Wai Ola

The Sovereign Council of Hawaiian Homestead Associations (SCHHA) is a statewide, self-governing Homestead Beneficiary Association (HBA) dedicated to the federally established Hawaiian Home Lands. We were founded in 1987 by Hawaiian Home Land leaders from across Hawaiʻi as a coalition to work on common challenges, solutions and approaches to the fulfillment of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920 (HHCA), like other Native Allotment Acts of over a century ago. SCHHA is a statewide homestead association, also referred to as a Homestead Beneficiary Association (HBA) in federal regulations. Our mission is the protection and perpetuation of the HHCA, its people, lands and the sovereignty of all self-governing HBAs. We provide services to 203,000 acres of HHCA trust lands, 10,000+ homestead lessees, 30,000+ waitlist individuals, 50+ regional HBAs and all enrolled SCHHA members regardless of blood quantum.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Ka Wai Ola

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Employers should help workers retrain when their jobs disappear.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You are vegetarian, but the leftover steak is headed for the trash. Do you eat it?

A vegetarian avoids buying meat because of animal welfare concerns. At work events, untouched meat is routinely thrown away, and eating it would neither increase demand nor cause another animal to be harmed.

Should a moral practice be judged by its consequences or its consistency?

Explore this quandary