Meet In CommonNews

Local

Senators question North Dakota judge pick Axt on experience, 2020 election, Jan. 6

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: North Dakota Monitor

North Dakota’s top appeals attorney faced questions from U.S. senators Tuesday about his experience and views on the 2020 election in his confirmation hearing for a federal judgeship. State Solicitor General Phil Axt sat with three other nominees before the Senate Judiciary Committee. President Donald Trump announced Axt’s nomination in August for the U.S. district judgeship previously held by Dan Traynor, who was confirmed earlier to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. U.S. Sens. John Hoeven and Kevin Cramer, both R-N.D., introduced Axt. They praised his military experience, West Point and Yale Law School background and legal acumen. “He’s got the finest academic accolades and accomplishments, but he’s a guy that served our country in battle, won the Bronze Star, and now he’s our state solicitor general. Now that’s pretty fantastic experience for a U.S. district court judge,” Hoeven said.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at North Dakota Monitor

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Countries should consider serious effects on people abroad when setting domestic policies.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The mayor is excellent at the job—and secretly cheating on a spouse. Is that news?

A local official is effective, honest in office, and privately having an affair. A journalist can verify it but finds no misuse of public resources or direct connection to official duties.

Does private dishonesty reveal something citizens are entitled to judge?

Explore this quandary