Meet In CommonNews

Local

Shadows no longer delay developments in San Francisco

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Center Square

(The Center Square) - A new San Francisco law is dialing back building delays caused by regulations over the shadows that new buildings cast. The repeal of the environmental protections rule is the latest in a string of development-friendly Bay Area moves during the administration of Mayor Daniel Lurie, who calls himself a centrist Democrat. Lurie signed the SHADE Act on Friday. “For decades, San Francisco has made it easier to block housing than to build it,” Lurie said. “Now we are using every tool available to build more housing more quickly, and this is just the latest example.” The Slashing Housing Appeals and Delays Everywhere, or SHADE, Act was passed during an 8-1 vote by the 11-person San Francisco Board of Supervisors, with Supervisor Connie Chan the sole dissenter. The board governs the combined county and city of San Francisco.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Center Square

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

People should receive a clear explanation before consenting to personal-data use.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your partner checks your location whenever you reply slowly. Is that caring or creepy?

A couple shares live phone locations for convenience and safety. One partner begins checking the map whenever a message goes unanswered, even though they have never agreed on when checking is appropriate.

Does granting access also grant permission to monitor?

Explore this quandary