Meet In CommonNews

Local

Sioux Falls Democrat seeks recount in state Senate race

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: South Dakota Searchlight

One of the five losing South Dakota legislative candidates with a race close enough for a recount has asked for one. Democrat Aaron Matson filed a recount request Thursday afternoon. The deadline to file for a recount is three days after the state canvass of election results. The canvass took place Tuesday. Matson lost the District 11 Senate race to Republican incumbent Chris Karr, the chamber’s president pro tempore, by 35 votes out of a total of 8,385 votes cast. The district is in southwest Sioux Falls. Democrats gain seats in South Dakota Legislature for the first time since 2008 The recount process is conducted by a board appointed by a local judge, consisting of a Republican attorney serving as recount referee and two other members, one each from the Republican and Democratic parties. The recount must be completed within 14 days of the recount petition’s filing. The remaining four candidates whose close races on Nov.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at South Dakota Searchlight

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Cities should actively seek views from residents who do not attend public meetings.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A patient records every doctor visit for their followers. Can the doctor refuse to be filmed?

A patient with a large social-media following livestreams their health journey and wants to record every appointment. They say the videos help others and keep doctors accountable. Their physician finds the camera distracting and worries that casual remarks will be edited out of context.

Whose comfort should control a conversation about one person's body and another person's work?

Explore this quandary