Meet In CommonNews

Local

South Dakota House Republicans select entirely new leadership after contentious election season

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: South Dakota Searchlight

South Dakota House Republicans selected an entirely new leadership team Monday, completing a shakeup arising from a contentious campaign season. Mike Stevens, of Yankton, is the nominee for speaker of the House, and Amber Arlint, of Sioux Falls, is the nominee for speaker pro tempore. Taylor Rehfeldt, of Sioux Falls, will be majority leader and Drew Peterson, of Salem, will be assistant majority leader. The majority whips are Nick Fosness, of Britton; Mellissa Heermann, of Brookings; Brian Mulder, of Sioux Falls; Matt Roby, of Watertown; and Mike Weisgram, of Fort Pierre. Rehfeldt is the first woman chosen as South Dakota’s House majority leader. In a statement to Searchlight, she said “I’m honored to be elected the first woman House majority leader in South Dakota history.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at South Dakota Searchlight

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Cultural events should adapt to welcome new audiences, even when some traditions change.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary