Meet In CommonNews

Local

Sportsbot 3000

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Fort Worth Weekly

Home Stuff Sports Sportsbot 3000 StuffSports “To err is human.” All the AI models in the world can’t replace the boneheaded game management of Brian Schottenheimer, nor should it. Courtesy DallasCowboys.com As a writer — even as a Cro-Magnon-brained sportswriter and musician — I am inherently dubious of AI. While it continues to worm itself into nearly every unoccupied molecule of space left in existence, we’ve been seemingly left no choice but to accept it. In some ways, it’s possible to see benefits, I suppose. It’s nifty to see what your house would look like in a different paint color or get a perfect two-day Disneyworld trip itinerary instantaneously. Yet I absolutely despise its tentacles reaching into creative endeavors. I fully believe that the arts represent humanity’s greatest achievements and are the truest objectives by which all other great human accomplishments — engineering, commerce, democracy, and so on — ultimately exist to enable.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Fort Worth Weekly

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Research participants' welfare should take priority over possible benefits to society.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A pricey AI tutor can turn B students into A students. Should schools let them use it?

An effective AI tutor adapts to each student and dramatically improves performance, but its subscription is expensive. A public school cannot provide it to everyone and worries that allowing its use will deepen existing inequality.

Should access be limited when a beneficial tool cannot yet be shared fairly?

Explore this quandary