Meet In CommonNews

Local

State Drops ‘Landlord Rule’ for Psilocybin Patients After Public Outcry

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Santa Fe Reporter

The state Department of Health has dropped a proposed rule that would have required renters to get their landlord’s approval before receiving psilocybin treatment at home, a reversal announced Friday, Oct. 30. The announcement was made at an advisory board meeting on Friday, but no final draft of the rules has yet been published. Earlier this month, DOH told SFR the requirement “has not been an issue so far,” but the proposed rule drew more opposition than any other. Of the roughly 30 speakers at an Oct. 2 draft rules hearing, 13 objected to it. The department subsequently received about 80 written dissenting comments. “This was the area that we saw really the most comments with regard, is with the landlord attestation, for individuals who were renting housing,” Dominick Zurlo, director of DOH’s Center for Medical Cannabis and Psilocybin, said at Friday’s Medical Psilocybin Advisory Board meeting. “In consultation with our legal department ...

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Santa Fe Reporter

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Elected representatives should serve people who voted against them as seriously as their supporters.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A stranger is behaving horribly in public. Do you record them?

You witness a stranger berating a service worker in public. Recording could create accountability and protect the worker, but posting the video could expose everyone involved to a permanent online audience.

Who gets to decide when public behavior becomes public content?

Explore this quandary