Meet In CommonNews

Local

State rep of 30 years will lead North Dakota House Republicans

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: North Dakota Monitor

One of the toughest jobs in North Dakota’s Legislature has a longtime figure taking charge. Rep. Robin Weisz, R-Hurdsfield, is the new House majority leader after House Republicans elected their leadership team Wednesday night. Senate Republicans reelected Sen. David Hogue, R-Minot, as their majority leader. Both men ran unopposed. “It will be an outstanding relationship because it already is,” Hogue said of their roles together. They will lead the two Republican supermajorities as perhaps the most visible members of the Legislature. The majority leaders steer the biennial legislative session, meet frequently with the governor, talk to the media and keep tabs on the Legislature’s work between sessions. Weisz has been speaker of the House for nearly two years, presiding over the 94-member chamber during floor sessions. He will hold both jobs simultaneously until a new speaker is elected in early December.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at North Dakota Monitor

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Public arts funding should prioritize access over attracting the largest audiences.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary