Meet In CommonNews

Local

卑詩南岸暴雨成災 彭伯頓部分地區緊急疏散

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Epoch Times

【大紀元2026年11月13日訊】(大紀元記者宇明加拿大溫哥華綜合報導)卑詩省南岸週四(12日)暴雨成災,彭伯頓(Pemberton)及史戈米殊(Squamish)多處道路被洪水淹沒,地方政府及原住民當局發布疏散令和就地避險建議,要求部分居民立即撤離。 利盧埃特原住民族(Líl̓wat Nation)週四上午擴大疏散範圍,並指出格林河(Green River)水量異常高漲,利盧埃特河(Lillooet River)水位預計繼續上升,伯肯黑德河(Birkenhead River)流量則接近歷史紀錄。 當地週末預計再迎來一場風暴,但降雨量仍不確定。史戈米殊市長肖恩 ‧伊斯頓(Sean Easton)表示:「我們一方面努力應對眼前的情況,同時也要確保為下一場風暴做好準備。」 彭伯頓部分地區下令緊急疏散 利盧埃特原住民族表示,利盧埃特湖路(Lillooet Lake Road)部分路段被洪水淹沒,路面水深約15至30厘米,呼籲民眾切勿步行或駕車穿越洪水。當局已在烏盧斯社區綜合中心(Úll̓us Community Complex)設立集合點及接待中心。 彭伯頓村的疏散令涵蓋彭伯頓區域機場(Pemberton Regional Airport)、卑詩野火服務處基地、高爾夫球場設施、一間動物收容所及少量住宅。當局已在彭伯頓及地區社區中心(Pemberton and District Community Centre)設立接待中心,協助需要撤往安全地點的居民。 整個彭伯頓村及彭伯頓谷(Pemberton Valley)內C選區的部分物業均處於疏散警戒狀態,居民須做好隨時撤離的準備。 彭伯頓谷同時發布就地避險建議,未接獲疏散令的居民應留在安全地點,避免外出。 洪水淹沒道路 多處交通中斷 史戈米殊—利盧埃特區域局(Squamish-Lillooet Regional District)表示,彭伯頓多條道路受洪水影響,部分路段無法通行,包括99號公路。當局警告,洪水可能進一步淹沒公路,導致通往惠斯勒(Whistler)的交通中斷。 據Global News報導,區域局主席珍 ‧福特(Jen Ford)說:「整個山谷多處地方的水位都已超過高水位標記。」 加拿大郵政亦因洪水影響彭伯頓的郵件派遞,發布紅色服務警報,寄往當地的郵件及包裹將暫時存放,直至服務恢復。…

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Epoch Times

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Athletes should have more influence over schedules affecting their health.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your anonymous review could cost a coworker a promotion. Do you sign your name?

A company requests anonymous feedback about a colleague being considered for promotion. You have serious concerns based on direct experience, but anonymity prevents them from asking questions or understanding the context of your criticism.

Does honest criticism require accepting personal accountability for it?

Explore this quandary