Meet In CommonNews

Local

Students Speak Out about Frustrations with Title 9

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: University of Northern Colorado The Mirror

How do you receive justice when nobody delivers it to you? If nobody speaks to you? If nobody informs you? What do you do after a multi-year long investigation leaves you with nothing? Conversations concerning university responsibility for delivering justice to victims of sexual assault are front and center following the Cornell Chi Phi assault case, and have inspired victims of sexual assault to share their stories online. At the University of Northern Colorado, conversations surrounding justice lead back to the Office of Institutional Equity and Compliance, where communication leaves much to be desired. Students can report assault to the OIEC office, which can result in a Title IX investigation. Title IX is a federal civil rights law that prohibits sex-based discrimination, including sexual assault. OIEC reviews reports and determines whether they are counted as misconduct according to UNC’s policies handbook, such as all non-consensual sexual contact, abuse and stalking.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at University of Northern Colorado The Mirror

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

School policy should consider all families rather than follow the loudest parental voices.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary