Meet In CommonNews

Local

Supervisors hear more about Abingdon nuisance property

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Southeast Iowa Union

ABINGDON - Jefferson County Board of Supervisors heard an update to a nuisance property in Abingdon during the Monday, Nov. 9 meeting. The property in question is 1561 Jefferson St. in Abingdon (in the northwest part of the county), previously owned by Charles Brown until his death in 2020. During the supervisors’ meeting on Monday, Oct. 26, they heard from Dakota Wadhams and Katie Weicht, neighbors of the property, who told the supervisors about a rat infestation affecting their own home, caused by the piles of trash on the Brown property.At Monday’s meeting, Wadhams said there were new developments since he last spoke to the supervisors. He put up cameras, which have recorded a person or persons dumping trash in the middle of the night, and stealing from another neighbor. “There are multiple new piles [of trash] across this property,” said Wadhams, who notified Assistant County Attorney Michael Campbell and the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office about the people dumping trash.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Southeast Iowa Union

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Sports organizations should limit gambling promotion aimed at their supporters.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You both hate the invitation. Which partner has to become the excuse?

A couple receives an invitation neither wants to accept. One suggests claiming the other is ill, reasoning that friends will question a vague excuse but respect sickness. The proposed patient dislikes lying but also wants to stay home.

Is a shared lie fair when only one person's reputation carries it?

Explore this quandary