Meet In CommonNews

Local

The Machine and the Altar: Silicon Valley Uses Traditionalism as Control

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Fair Observer

There is a pattern in the men who now own the infrastructure of modern life, and it looks at first like hypocrisy. They are radicals about technology and reactionaries about human beings. They will remake what you see, what you read, what you buy, whom you meet, what you believe and what you want, at a speed no society has ever had to absorb — and then, having appointed themselves the agents of permanent revolution in every technical domain, they turn to the arrangement of human life and discover that the old order was right all along. A woman’s place. A nation’s blood. A father’s authority. The natural hierarchy of the strong over the weak. Move fast and break everything, they say, except the hierarchy. It is tempting to call this contradiction, and to leave it there. Call Elon Musk a hypocrite for preaching free speech while throttling it, or for championing fatherhood as an abstraction while scattering children across a dozen households.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Fair Observer

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Basic classroom needs should take priority over optional school programs when budgets are cut.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your best friend is an AI that profits when you stay lonely. Is the friendship real?

A lonely adult considers an AI companion their closest confidant. The service is always patient and supportive, but the company profits when users spend more time engaged with it.

Does a comforting system have a duty to make itself less necessary?

Explore this quandary