Meet In CommonNews

Local

Threats to broadcasters hang over FCC nominee hearing

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Roll Call

FCC nominee Danielle Thumann Severs waits to testify during her confirmation hearing with the Senate Commerce Committee on Tuesday. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) By Allison Mollenkamp Posted November 10, 2026 at 5:06pm President Donald Trump’s Republican nominee to the Federal Communications Commission faced opposition Tuesday from Senate Democrats who fear the commission could be controlled exclusively by Republicans under Chairman Brendan Carr, who they vowed to investigate in the next Congress. Appearing before the Senate Commerce Committee, nominee Danielle Thumann Severs limited her commitments to independence from Carr, including on regulating broadcasters based on their content decisions. Much of the hearing focused on Carr and his threats to use the FCC to punish broadcasters he disagrees with. Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., said that he expects Carr will not last long in his position once Democrats take control of Congress in the new year. “Mr.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Roll Call

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Workers should share in the financial gains from technology that increases their productivity.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A parent clearly built the winning science project. Who should lose the prize?

An elementary student submits an elaborate science project far beyond their apparent ability. The parent proudly describes working together all weekend, and the child clearly learned something, but other students completed simpler projects themselves.

What is a fair response when help improves learning but distorts achievement?

Explore this quandary