Meet In CommonNews

Local

Tigers get washed away by JFK

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Brooklyn Reporter

This would be the second year in a row that the schedule-makers assigned the 2-1 Fort Hamilton Tigers to play a Friday night game at the 3-0 JFK Knights’ home field at Spuyten Duyvil in the Bronx. With the expectation of a flat start from the long Brooklyn bus ride, the Tigers surprised their top tier Bronx opponents and dominated play during the first quarter. The Tigers maintained possession all quarter as quarterback J. T. Turner drove downfield using a trio of running backs — Tom O’Neill, Jayden Pagan and Mekhi Smith. Eating up the quarter on the ground, the Tigers reached the one-yard line only to be denied the end zone on fourth down. Using their goal line stand as a rallying point, the Knights proceeded to score twice in the second quarter to quickly gain the lead. Avery Reed (126 yards rushing and 3 TDs) started JFK’s scoring with a 31-yard run, followed by an 11-yard run by Dayvion Stephens to give the Knights a 14-0 half-time lead.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Brooklyn Reporter

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Correcting clear officiating errors is worth some interruption to a game's flow.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The proposal is perfect and the ring is terrible. When do you say so?

Your partner proposes with a costly ring chosen after months of secret planning. You love the proposal and want the marriage, but strongly dislike the ring you would be expected to wear every day. Returns are possible for one week.

How much honesty can a loving gesture reasonably be asked to survive?

Explore this quandary