Meet In CommonNews

Local

Traxler: Elk Point-Jefferson shows off power-rushing prowess for another Class 11B title

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Daily Republic

VERMILLION — At a clip of 9 yards a play, Elk Point-Jefferson washed away some of the sting of the 2025 Class 11B championship game. And at the same time, the No. 1-seeded Huskies inflicted 61 points worth of pain on St. Thomas More in a state championship rematch on Friday at the DakotaDome in a 61-13 rout over the No. 2 Cavaliers, snapping STM’s 23-game win streak. There were no secrets about how the Huskies made it happen, rushing the ball on 40 of 41 plays in the win and to the tune of 390 yards, all of them on the ground. It was an 11-man championship record for points in a victory, scoring as many points in the first half as the Cavaliers did in all of the 2025 meeting with 48 points. “We just came in ready to go, ready to execute,” Joe Robbie MVP running back Brody Van Roekel said after rushing for 178 yards and three touchdowns.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Daily Republic

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

A useful review should explain a work rather than merely rate it.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary