Meet In CommonNews

Local

Trump administration wants to trim BLM process behind Rock Springs Resource Management Plan

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Star Valley Independent

• ‘The current planning process is too slow, too complicated and weighed down by outdated requirements,’ BLM Director Steve Pearce said. By Katie Klingsporn, WyoFile.com The Department of the Interior is proposing updates to the regulations that govern Bureau of Land Management land-use planning, three years after a management planning process for 3.6 million acres of public land in southwestern Wyoming fueled a political firestorm. The proposals aim to update a decades-old set of regulations by cutting unnecessary red tape, improving coordination with state and local governments and hastening decision-making for public lands across the country, according to an announcement from the department. “The current planning process is too slow, too complicated and weighed down by outdated requirements,” BLM Director Steve Pearce said in the announcement.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Star Valley Independent

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Customers should receive clear explanations when a company cannot provide its promised service.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your family connection could get your child into their dream school. Do you use it?

A university argues that considering family ties builds loyalty and encourages donations that fund scholarships. Critics say the preference preserves inherited advantage and takes places from stronger applicants.

Can benefits to the whole institution justify an unequal admissions advantage?

Explore this quandary