Meet In CommonNews

Local

UND shuts out St. Thomas with third straight defensive performance

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Grand Forks Herald

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Last week was no fluke. UND does, in fact, appear to be a good defensive hockey team. The Fighting Hawks beat St. Thomas 2-0 on Friday night in Lee and Penny Anderson Arena, holding a third consecutive opponent to under 20 shots on goal. Will Zellers scored in the first period, Anthony Menghini scored in the third and UND extended its unbeaten streak to three games. "I thought we played a real mature game," UND coach Dane Jackson said. "I thought our puck management was good. I thought we continued to check and track and do a good job of making it hard on entry. . . just a lot of selfless plays out there." UND (6-3-1) dominated puck possession for large stretches of Friday night's game. When the Tommies did push, Špunar was there. He made a terrific save on Czech countryman Jakub Altrichter, moving from right to left to deny a one-timer attempt in the third period. He stoned St.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Grand Forks Herald

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Preserving historic places can justify limiting redevelopment.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You find a rare library book your father kept for forty years. Do you return it anonymously?

While clearing your father's attic, you find a rare book stamped by the local library and due in 1986. The library would be thrilled to recover it, but returning it openly would expose a secret he apparently kept for decades—and might produce a spectacular overdue fine.

Does making an old wrong right require admitting who did it?

Explore this quandary