Meet In CommonNews

Local

Upper Snake reservoir system Oct. 31 volume avoids ’03 low

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Capital Press

The Upper Snake River reservoir system ended the water year with its second lowest level in 30 years. Irrigation shutoffs and above-average precipitation during October kept month-end volume from falling beneath the 30-season low, which occurred in 2003, according to figures from Idaho Falls, Idaho-based state Water District 1 The high came in 2017. Oct. 31 volume is a benchmark for system carryover into the following year because irrigation winds down during the month. The low 2026 total reflects that carryover at the end of the 2025 irrigation season was below average, and “then, we had very poor snowpack over the winter,” WD 1 watermaster Craig Chandler said. As for the 2026 irrigation season, “the year had low storage allocations and high storage demand,” he said At present, the April 1 forecast of Snake River stream volume as measured at the Heise gauge northeast of Idaho Falls needs to exceed 120% of normal to have a chance of filling the system, Chandler said.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Capital Press

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

News organizations should disclose major financial relationships that could influence their coverage.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

An app can text exactly like someone you lost. Would you keep talking to it?

A service can create a conversational likeness from a deceased person's messages and recordings. A grieving family member finds it comforting, although the deceased never consented to this use of their data.

Can comfort justify creating a voice the dead never authorized?

Explore this quandary