Meet In CommonNews

Local

Vermont receives $190M in the second year of federal rural health awards

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: VTDigger

Vermont is set to receive nearly $190 million in 2027 from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in the second year of the federal rural healthcare transformation program. In 2026, CMS awarded Vermont $195 million, which the state has just finished awarding to more than 200 projects statewide. The second year of the five-year program is expected to look a lot like the first, according to Vermont’s Medicaid and health systems director, Jill Mazza Olson, who oversees the project in the state. Olson and her colleagues said they submitted the state’s year-two proposal hewing closely to its first-year application, which prioritized projects under four broad categories: bolstering the healthcare workforce, strengthening primary care, moving care outside of hospitals and investing in how healthcare providers share services.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at VTDigger

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Punishments should be evaluated by their effect on future harm, not only their severity.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The company allows an $80 dinner. Is ordering the lobster fair game?

During work travel, company policy permits an expensive dinner. A modest option is nearby, but colleagues choose the nicest restaurant because the company can easily afford it and everyone is within the stated limit.

Is following a rule enough when you are spending someone else's money?

Explore this quandary