Meet In CommonNews

Local

Vermont’s schools are not the problem. Property tax is.

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: VTDigger

This commentary is by Paul Cillo, a former member of the Vermont House and co-author of Act 60. In his 2025 inaugural address, Gov. Phil Scott decried rising education property taxes. He noted that if trends continue as they have, property tax bills will have increased by an average of 33% in just three years. It is true that changes made in the Legislature to Vermont’s education financing system have propelled property taxes skyward. But instead of addressing education taxes head-on, the governor has used the problem to advance his pet education schemes: consolidation and greater state control. While talking about what he calls a “transformation” to make schools more efficient and better for children, he is pushing a Republican same-old, same-old: Cut taxes and “do more with less.” I’m not an expert on how to improve Vermont’s schools, but I know that spending less is not the first step to making them better for kids.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at VTDigger

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Schools should evaluate new teaching approaches by actual improvements in learning.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your new television goes on sale elsewhere. Can you return it and buy the identical one cheaper?

A week after buying a television, another store offers the same model for much less. Your retailer refuses to match the price but allows unopened-looking returns. You could carefully repack the perfectly functional set.

Is a generous return policy permission to reverse a deal for any reason?

Explore this quandary