Meet In CommonNews

Local

Vermonters Consider Alternative Heat Sources Amid Soaring Fuel Costs

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Seven Days

The 250 gallons of heating oil that Nate Thames had delivered to his Vershire home last fall cost him $3.21 per gallon, or about $800. This August, after heating oil prices spiked to $4.73 per gallon, that same delivery ran him nearly $1,200. Relatively speaking, though, his timing was good: Prices in Vermont just soared past $6 per gallon. President Donald Trump’s ongoing war with Iran is largely to blame for sky-high fuel prices. The costs of heating oil and kerosene, the main fuel source for about 40 percent of owner-occupied Vermont homes, have risen about 80 percent since the end of 2025. The increases threaten to inflict significant financial suffering in Vermont, a state with harsh winters and some of the oldest housing stock in the nation. Thames is doing everything he can to cope, including stocking up on more firewood. But he’s worried many of his neighbors lack that option.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Seven Days

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Leagues should limit financial advantages that make competition persistently unequal.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your family connection could get your child into their dream school. Do you use it?

A university argues that considering family ties builds loyalty and encourages donations that fund scholarships. Critics say the preference preserves inherited advantage and takes places from stronger applicants.

Can benefits to the whole institution justify an unequal admissions advantage?

Explore this quandary