Meet In CommonNews

Local

Victor Marx, Religious Expression and University Funding

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Catalyst

Victor Marx is a Christian Republican from Colorado Springs running for governor of Colorado. But he says he is not running to “be an evangelist” or to evangelize the state. “I’m becoming governor to uphold our Constitution and to make our state safe again,” Marx, a high-profile Christian ministry leader and first-time candidate, said during an Oct. 21 virtual press conference for student journalists organized by FoxTalk. He claimed that Colorado’s motto, “Nil Sine Numine,” Latin for “Nothing without Providence or Deity,” is inherently Christian and the Founding Fathers wrote Christianity into the Constitution. The phrase comes from Virgil’s “Aeneid,” an ancient Greek epic poem. Colorado’s first territorial governor chose the motto. Marx faces long-shot odds against Democratic Attorney General Phil Weiser, whom even some high-profile Republicans expect will win handily. Colorado has not elected a Republican governor in 20 years.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Catalyst

Featured places to meet in Colorado Springs, CO

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

3.14 Pi Bar

3.14 Pi Bar 5152 Centennial Boulevard Colorado Springs, CO, 80919 US

City guide for Colorado Springs, CO

Community Poll

Schools should be judged on student wellbeing as well as academic results.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary