Meet In CommonNews

Local

VisionQuest Post-Credits Scene Brings Back Fan-Favorite Character

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Artvoice

TV & FilmVisionQuest Post-Credits Scene Brings Back Fan-Favorite CharacterTTroy Smith · November 11, 2026Troy SmithSharefXin✉The “VisionQuest” finale on Disney+ ended with a post-credits scene in which Robert Downey Jr.’s Doctor Doom resurrects Elizabeth Olsen’s Scarlet Witch, a major tease for “Avengers: Doomsday.”In the scene, Wanda Maximoff lies under rubble at Mount Wundagore, where she apparently died at the end of “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.” Doom lifts the debris and tells her, “Scarlet Witch, awaken, your power will be mine,” according to Yahoo’s recap.The scene doesn’t show Wanda agreeing to help him, and Marvel has not officially confirmed Olsen as part of the “Doomsday” cast.The finale, titled “Forever” and released Tuesday, also brought Paul Bettany’s Vision together with the sons he shares with Wanda, Tommy, played by Ruaridh Mollica, and Billy, played by Joe Locke, who arrives through a portal.The brothers combine their powers to save their father.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Artvoice

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Major project cost overruns should trigger a public review before more money is committed.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary