Meet In CommonNews

Local

Water battle likely headed for trial

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Ouray County Plaindealer

DELTA – A Colorado water court judge appears likely to let supporters and opponents of a pipeline diversion from Cow Creek into Ridgway Reservoir duke out their claims at a trial scheduled for next year. As the long-running water rights application inches toward a resolution, Division 4 Water Court Judge Steven L. Schultz signaled at a hearing last week that he was wary of letting a coalition of environmentalists and ranchers stop the project in its tracks. Schultz repeatedly suggested that what opponents of the project asserted as undisputed facts — including that the project is an engineering non-starter — were in fact contested issues to be sorted out at trial. And he voiced skepticism at their argu- ments that Tri-County Water Conservancy District had distorted the project’s aims over the course of the litigation. “I have yet to have a case go to trial that is exactly the same as it was [when filed],” Schultz said.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Ouray County Plaindealer

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Reporting on court cases should protect personal privacy when details add little public value.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your carry-on fits only if you sit on it. Do you try the airport sizer?

Your suitcase is slightly larger than the airline allows, although it has fit overhead on previous flights. Checking it costs extra and risks missing a connection. Other passengers have equally questionable bags and staff are checking inconsistently.

Does uneven enforcement weaken a traveler's duty to follow the rule?

Explore this quandary