Meet In CommonNews

Local

We’re asking tough questions about Oklahoma’s role in immigration detention. Your support makes it possible.

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Frontier

November 13, 2026 From conditions inside Oklahoma’s largest immigration detention center to the changing federal policies affecting immigrants across the state, The Frontier is committed to following the story. Your year-end donation will help sustain that work — and will be matched through NewsMatch. Tweet Share Share Author Ari Fife [email protected] Reading Time 2 min Posted In fundraising Frontier Staff Writer Ari Fife works at The Frontier’s Oklahoma City office. BRIANNA BAILEY/The Frontier In September, I drove almost three hours to a state prison in Alva near the Kansas border to try to speak with one person — Oklahoma Department of Corrections director Justin Farris. The state Board of Corrections was holding a meeting there, and I knew it could be my only chance to ask Farris in person about the contract the Department of Corrections had signed with the federal government to house immigration detainees at the privately run Diamondback Correctional Facility in Watonga.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Frontier

Featured places to meet in Alva, OK

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

City guide for Alva, OK

Community Poll

People affected by infrastructure routes should have a meaningful role in choosing them.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary