Meet In CommonNews

Local

Weimar outlasts Refugio in overtime 22-16

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Victoria Advocate

The thrill of victory, the agony of defeat. Both of those distinct emotions were on full display Friday night at Cuero High. The Weimar Wildcats overcame a 16-8 deficit in the final seconds of regulation to force overtime in the opening round of the UIL 2A D1 Texas Football State Playoffs. In overtime, the Wildcats finished off the comeback with a 22-16 triumph. The Bobcats forged ahead 16-8 with 27 seconds to go in the third quarter. A 36-yard touchdown pass from Matthew Perez to Nehimiah Cavasos on a contested catch near the pylon plus a two-point conversion gave Refugio an eight-point lead down the stretch. The Bobcats maintained that lead through virtually the entire fourth period. With under four minutes to go in the quarter, it appeared Refugio was on the verge of scoring again and putting the game away. It was third-and-goal from the Weimar 3 but a false start and a tackle for loss forced a fourth-and-goal from the Weimar 11.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Victoria Advocate

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Polluters should pay cleanup costs even when the damage occurred many years ago.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You find a rare library book your father kept for forty years. Do you return it anonymously?

While clearing your father's attic, you find a rare book stamped by the local library and due in 1986. The library would be thrilled to recover it, but returning it openly would expose a secret he apparently kept for decades—and might produce a spectacular overdue fine.

Does making an old wrong right require admitting who did it?

Explore this quandary