Meet In CommonNews

Local

What can a soccer club teach us about policy?

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Miscellany News

Masquerading as a soccer club, Manchester United is really an entity designed to suck the soul out of all who support it. What was once England’s top team has now descended into a mess of incompetence across all levels. Every new dawn is soon pulled back into an enduring nightmare. Why am I writing this? No, it is not a method of processing the agony I have from watching them every week. I think that United offers a very clear lesson for our current political-economic moment: The world we lived in yesterday is not the same as the one we are living now. To plan as if what we have is “given” or “correct” prevents us from adequately addressing new challenges that come up with development. First, a little bit of history for those who do not follow English soccer. Manchester United was once considered one of the best teams in the world.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Miscellany News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Predictable working hours are more important than maximum scheduling flexibility.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary