Meet In CommonNews

Local

Woman Says Father-in-Law Is Obsessed With Their Finances, Then She Shares Their Text Exchange

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Daily Dot

A Reddit post in r/inlaws about a father-in-law contacting his son’s manager drew support and debate. The woman, posting as u/autisticvampirewife, shared a text exchange between her husband and his father. Her husband asked his father to stop monitoring his work activity. The post had 494 upvotes and 138 comments, at the time of publication. The post included a screenshot of a text exchange between the husband and the father. “Please stop stalking my work activity dad,” he wrote. He also asked his father to stop calling his manager for job updates. His father replied, “Worry about yourself not me,” before asking, “Who’s being abusive now?” The Reddit user said her father-in-law remained fixated on the couple’s finances. She wrote that the couple had stopped sharing financial information with him, which she believed frustrated him. According to her post, her father-in-law believed her husband was lying about being employed.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Daily Dot

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Correcting clear officiating errors is worth some interruption to a game's flow.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The sign says twelve items and you have fourteen. Is the express lane still yours?

The regular checkout lines are long and the express lane is empty. You count fourteen small items, two over the posted limit. A shopper approaches behind you carrying a single carton of milk as the cashier waves you forward.

Are small rules optional when enforcing them would seem fussier than breaking them?

Explore this quandary