Meet In CommonNews

Local

Writing Tips: What Editors Keep Flagging in Manuscripts

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Daily Pencil

The same notes come back with most first manuscripts: mechanical slips, shaky structure, and facts that do not hold. The Chicago Manual of Style describes editing work as running from mechanical corrections to remedial work on baggy prose. Most copy editing jobs fall into one of three levels: light, medium, and heavy. The pattern is old, and it is fixable. Editor notes cluster around a short list of habits. A writer who knows the list can clear much of it before anyone else reads a page. The trail runs from the first reader to the final proof. What Gets Marked First Mechanical consistency comes first. According to Einsohn, cited in a standard survey of copyediting, mechanical editors chase abbreviations, capitalization, hyphenation, italics, numbers, punctuation, quotations, and spelling. None of it is glamorous. All of it is visible. An editor who fixes every comma has less time for the story. Consistency is the operative word.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Daily Pencil

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Allegations should not be treated as proven until a fair process establishes the facts.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your family connection could get your child into their dream school. Do you use it?

A university argues that considering family ties builds loyalty and encourages donations that fund scholarships. Critics say the preference preserves inherited advantage and takes places from stronger applicants.

Can benefits to the whole institution justify an unequal admissions advantage?

Explore this quandary