Meet In CommonNews

Local

You look like you have an opinion

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Vermont Cynic

On my final day of first-year orientation, I was stopped by a grown man from Abolitionists Rising carrying a poster with a giant AI-generated image of a bloody fetus. “Hey, you look like you have an opinion,” he said. He’s right. This confrontation turned into a 40-minute debate between a middle aged man and a 17-year-old girl about women’s bodily autonomy and religious freedom. Abolitionists Rising is a far-right, anti-abortion, Christian extremist organization. “Our goals are the abolition of abortion, the repentance of the nation, and the glorification of God,” stated their “Who We Are” page. There’s a link to their storefront immediately under that, because nothing says godliness like a price tag and merch. Abortion is bad because Jesus says so, and Jesus is the one and only true god, he said. I brought up that my religion says that abortion is okay, because in life or death scenarios, it’s more important to save the parent’s life than an unborn child, according to the Torah.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Vermont Cynic

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

People selling health products should provide evidence for their claimed benefits.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your family wants an AI to settle an old argument. Would you hand over the group chat?

A recurring family dispute has reached the point where nobody agrees on what was actually said. Your cousin proposes uploading five years of the family group chat to an AI that can reconstruct events, flag contradictions, and recommend a fair resolution. Nearly everyone agrees—but one relative refuses.

Can a tool make a family argument fair without turning intimacy into evidence?

Explore this quandary